Tue, 28 Jun 2022
22.7 C
Durban

Chemical disaster ‘tip of regulatory failure iceberg’

Home Manufacturing & Processing Chemicals Chemical disaster ‘tip of regulatory failure iceberg’

By Burt Rodrigues

BY now we’ve all read and seen footage of the horrendous fire at agro-chemical giant UPL’s warehouse in Durban. This not only put firefighters lives at risk as they didn’t not know what they were walking in to, but it has also caused long-lasting environmental damage to the land, beaches, rivers, estuary and ocean.

According to news reports there were a number of chemicals stored there that have been banned in multiple countries. Worse, this close to schools, a golf estate, a busy Makro store and one of South Africa’s main tourism destinations, Umhlanga. Luckily the school was on holiday, otherwise the health hazards could have been even more dire.

The real question here is how did UPL get permission to build such a chemical hazard in this area and then somehow avoid the regulatory process that includes the environmental and risk studies by the National Environmental Management Act (Nema) and the Occupational Health and Safety Act (OSHA)?

Under Nema, if you store more than 80m3 of “dangerous goods” it’s a listed activity and requires a basic assessment report; more than 500m3 requires a full environmental impact assessment (EIA). According to reports the warehouse stored more than 6 000m3 of “crop solution products”, with more than 500m3 containing chemicals considered so dangerous they’re banned elsewhere in the world.

Despite denials by the company that it acted negligently, ongoing enquiries will hopefully divulge the truth and, you’d like to think, the prevention of this ever happening again. But can we trust this assurance?

This isn’t the only such unregulated facility in South Africa. It’s only come to people’s attention now because of the results of the fire. The failure of the regulatory bodies to prevent this has now led to KZN not only facing environmental problems but also the loss of one of the biggest suppliers of agro products.

In a stringent regulatory environment this wouldn’t happen. Society needs to understand why such regulations exist. The lack of will by the regulatory bodies and the lack of will by the manufacturer to comply without anyone demanding a change will see this situation just carrying on.

Burt Rodrigues is CEO of Biodx

Most Popular

Why Sanral cancelled R4bn Eastern Cape tenders

IN May, the South African National Road Agency (Sanral) announced that a "material conflict of interest" arose in the evaluation of tenders for major...

Leading car maker adopts two new earth-friendly projects

AS a major step on the road to Zero Impact Production, Volkswagen Group South Africa (VWSA) has implemented two projects to dramatically reduce the...

Day Zero is inching closer but not with us yet

WHILE Nelson Mandela Bay is inching ever closer to Day Zero, the city’s taps have not yet run dry, and currently all communities in...

Company takes bargaining council for road freight and logistics industry to court

THE extension of the National Bargaining Council for the Road Freight and Logistics Industry Main Collective Agreement is bad news for employers and employees...